🔗 Share this article

Industry experts have voiced considerable caution regarding recent claims that American oil giants will quickly pump billions of dollars to fix the country's broken production facilities.

Demand for Solid Assurances

Lacking an solid promise of financial backing from the US federal government, experts believe global energy giants to act with great care.

“It seems premature to discuss any potential investments,” a representative said in response.

The aggressive schedule of less than a year and a half has been boldly proposed. However, realistic assessments indicate a longer timeline.

A More Realistic Schedule

“It is likely going to take three years for any significant output increase,” said one energy analyst.

Experts believe oil companies would likely spend:

• Year one: Securing new operating agreements.
• The second year: Investing in reconstruction of equipment.
• Final phase: Starting to boost production.

This would lead to an increase of around 500,000 bpd possibly by the end of the decade.

Interest vs. Appetite for Spending

Analysts draw a key distinction between firms' attention and their readiness to commit significantly.

“I think their curiosity is an eight, on a scale of ten. I think their willingness is a four or five, because there is no clarity yet.”

Seasoned observers in the sector share this caution. They believe that majors will politically call it fantastic while in practice acting with great care.

The Vast Investment Required

The required investment would be colossal. Research estimates suggest that increasing production by between half a million and a million barrels per day would require over $10 billion in capital spending over two to three years.

However, rebuilding output to historical levels of around 2.5 million barrels per day could require a staggering $80 billion to $90 billion over many more years.

The Unanswered Question of Taxpayer Funding

The idea of energy companies being compensated by the government has been repeatedly floated. But, specific plans on this proposal have so far not been announced.

The absence of a solid plan is the key reason behind the sector's hesitation. Companies seek guarantees against political risk and the risk that a subsequent government could refuse any deal.

“It is essential to be protected from nationalization, that we’ve seen in Venezuela already.”

Therefore, while political confidence runs high, the financial risks suggest a road of slow deliberation for any major venture in the country's energy industry.